Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Faul's False Ears

Faul's false ears are considered by some to be the "smoking gun" that Paul McCartney was replaced. Let's take a look at what Paul McCartney's ears looked like first. As you can see, the earlobes were attached.

Now, let us take a look at some pictures of Faul's ears. Sometimes they look unattached, sometimes they look just plain fake.

Paul McCartney & Wings - Mull of Kintyre [live '1977]

Here are some more pictures showing obvious anatomical differences between the ears of Faul and Paul.

Now comparing the ears side by side:

I don't know how much plainer it can be that those are not the same ears. This was also the conclusion of two Italian forensics experts, Francesco Gavazzeni and Carlesi Gabriella in an article in the August 2009 Italian issue of WIRED magazine. This is a machine translation of part of the article:
...Technically called trago [tragus:]. All we have two, one by ear, but the characteristics are different for every human being. ‘In Germany, a recognition procedure craniometric, identification of the right ear is even tantamount to fingerprint, ie the collection of fingerprints,’ recalls Carlesi. But what is trago? It is the small cartilage covered with skin that overhangs the entrance to the ear and ear canal, like the whole ear, cannot be changed surgically. How then to explain the differences between the right ear of Paul McCartney in a previous snapshot to 1966 and probably a built in the late nineties? It is not only to betray trago a different conformation as well as other parts, just above the ear canal entrance, measurements and dell'antelice propeller. Things that ordinary mortals might seem irrelevant or unclear, but instead, every day, allowing the experts to locate and identify persons, bodies, photographs...
"Ask Who Was the 'Beatle,'"

This is an interesting picture. It seems that "Paul" on the right has had some Photoshop work done on his ear. Maybe it was for the benefit of people who have noticed differences in the ears? An attempt to change history maybe?

~ T. Faulster

Join the discussion: Paul is Dead: Miss Him forum

EDIT: Here is some information on using ear biometrics to identify people. In this case, the different ears can be used to detect the imposter.
...When employing face or lip as a biometric, changing of their appearance with the expression of the subject creates problem but in case of ear the shape and appearance is fixed.
...Identification by ear biometrics is promising because it is passive like face recognition, but instead of the difficulties to extract face biometrics, it uses robust and simply extracted biometrics like those in fingerprinting. The ear is a unique feature of human beings. Even the ears of “identical twins” differ in some respects. There are persons in crime laboratories that assume that the human external ear characteristics are unique to each individual and unchanging during the lifetime of an adult...
Person Identification Using Ear Biometrics
Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Md. Rashedul Islam, Nazmul Islam Bhuiyan, Bulbul Ahmed, Md. Aminul Islam
... All we have two, one by ear, but the characteristics are different for every human being. "In Germany, a recognition procedure craniometrico, identification of the right ear even tantamount to fingerprint, ie the collection of fingerprints," recalls Carlesi. But what trago? It is the small cartilage covered with skin that overhangs the entrance to the ear and ear canal, like the whole ear, not be changed surgically ...
Fabio Gigante Andriola and Alessandra | 15 July 2009

EDIT: A member of Macca's Fun House - a forum with the express purpose of suppressing the Truth about PID - is trying to use this doctored photo as "proof" that Paul's and Faul's ears are "the same." It has been sufficiently proven that the ears were markedly different.


  1. NanabirdDec 17, 2009 06:49 AM
    What a truly excellent post ! You have really hit the nail on the head !!!
  2. AnonymousJan 7, 2010 05:27 PM
    A Very Good Analysis.
    The "Queen" is exposed.
    Now and Forever

    Sun King
  3. Plastic MaccaJan 7, 2010 05:30 PM
    Sun King,

    Thank you for your comment. It's an honor, Sir.

    The Truth will be exposed!

  4. buy viagraMay 19, 2010 09:51 AM
    I remember the days when the Beatles were in fashion, music was very popular.
  5. .Jul 29, 2010 09:59 AM
    The Eyes and Ears have it as the saying goes and that alone would be enough to establish these are two distinct and different people. Also the one thing that never changes in a face is the lines of symmetery. If you are 25 or 75 they remain consistent unless surgically altered which would be quite involved : not common cosmetic procedures.
    The jaw width is inconsistent, the nose length and angle are inconsistent, the head shape is inconsistent, and the face length is inconsistent.
  6. AnonymousOct 8, 2010 05:11 PM
    your work is perfect
    thank you tina
    my uncle,an english teacher at the time,told me in the late 70's about this "legend" concerning paul being replaced. I was young, and i didn't even understand what he was meaning!
    thanks to your work, things are clear now.
  7. AnonymousMar 3, 2011 06:32 PM
    Okay, I found it. The photo below me is officially without a doubt the WORST set of Faul's prosthetic ears of all time. You truly have to see this to believe it, Plastic Macca. Not only do they look hopelessly fake but they DON'T EVEN HAVE HOLES. It's a solid hunk of plastic. Please put this photo on your blog or on your photobucket because it's...unbelievable.

    To view it simply copy and paste into your web address bar to view (don't google it, because it doesn't work that way). Please let me know what you think!
  8. Plastic MaccaMar 3, 2011 11:37 PM
    ^ Thank you for sending that picture of Faul's fake ear. It looks like his earlobe has been gnawed off by a rabid dog. I posted it to the PID Miss Him forum & the Doppelganger forum. Good stuff. Keep it coming! :)

  9. AnonymousApr 16, 2011 05:29 PM
    coo, the pics are great
  10. AnonymousDec 30, 2011 08:56 PM
    I am really concerned, why would his parents and the other beatles keep up the lie? Didn't they care about Paul at all? I mean they MUST have noticed it wasn't the same person. Hw could they just phase him out and not tell anyone, I am so confused. I guess I need more answers, I really need to know why they keept the charade up.
  11. Plastic MaccaDec 30, 2011 11:49 PM
    The family & friends may have been bribed &/or threatened to keep silent. Heather Mills almost spilled the beans (we think), but she got death threats, so clammed up.

Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.